中国会成为世界最后一个世界超级大国排名吗

英媒:中国将会成为怎样的超级大国?_新浪新闻
&&&&&&正文
英媒:中国将会成为怎样的超级大国?
   英国广播公司10月19日文章,原题:一种观点:中国会成为哪种超级大国 很明显,近期的北京充满着辩论。虽然中国没有西方式的民主,但这并不妨碍其现在成为世界上最重要、最有趣的讨论主题。
  一年前,当我在中国外交部为中国的年轻外交官演讲时,极其明显,一个令人着迷的辩论正在展开&&应该为正在成为一个世界大国的中国制定什么样的外交政策。
  中国成为超级大国后会是什么样的?你也许已经对该问题展开过思考&&但答案是不对的。
  中国的军力和美国相比还是十分弱小。美国拥有11艘航空母舰,中国在上个月才开始拥有第一艘航母,且该航母的船体由乌克兰提供。
  除此之外,中国在国际社会的政治影响力还十分有限。
  中国的经济力量使我们感知到它是个超级大国&&中国的经济规模已经超过了美国的一半,预计在2018年左右其经济规模还将超越美国,尽管现在中国的经济增长率已经跌至7%左右。不过,是中国庞大的人口数量造就了中国经济奇迹,从科技水准和生活水平方面来说,中国还是远远的落后于美国。
  所以当我们谈及超级大国&&中国时,我们是在使用将来时。
  对中国成为一个超级大国这种想法的常规反应是&&如果没有表现得更差劲,它的行为将和美国一样。因为中国不是一个民主国家,所以有表现更差劲的可能性。中国由共产党领导,中国人的想法和我们也不一样。我想正是因此大家才会对中国的崛起感到有些紧张。
  实际上,我们不应期待中国会和美国表现得一样。中美的差异巨大。不过我们也不应理所当然地认为中国会表现得更差劲。
  为什么中美差异巨大呢?因为它们的历史是截然不同的。许多文章经常从“新殖民主义”角度出发讨论中国通过贸易和投资手段增强在非洲的存在。
  若正视历史,中国从未殖民过其它国家。海外殖民是欧洲人的特长,日本在不长的历史时期内也有过殖民行为。
  举例来说,在15世纪初,中国就有能力令东南亚沦为其殖民地。当时的中国拥有实力,它拥有数不清的船只,那些船只的体积比同时期欧洲所拥有的庞大数倍。不过中国并未选择殖民。
  这并不说明中国忽视了它的邻国。相反,在很多个世纪内,中国主宰着它们,当时的中国不仅幅员辽阔且发展水平远超它国。不过当时中国和其邻国的关系非植根于殖民文化,而是以附属国体系为根基。中国从未统治或占领它们,相反,作为对中华帝国权威认可的象征,那些附属国的统治者会被要求向中国朝贡,以换取中国对其的市场准入以及各种形式的保护。
  中国昔日的附属国体系不仅囊括当今整个东亚&&全球过30%人口的家园,还从日本、朝鲜延伸至马来半岛和部分印度尼西亚。
  该体系被证明具有相当的稳定性,它被施行了2000多年,直到1900年左右才告终。
  中国和西方共有一个特色&&它们双方都相信自己具有普世性,是他国的楷模。不过它们在实际行动中对此的诠释却大相庭径。对欧洲和后来的美国来说,这意味着在全球范围内维护自己的权力,在19世纪和20世纪前半叶的殖民全盛期,当世界大部被欧洲收入囊中时,它们这种行为尤为明显。
  我们四处扩张统治他国,强行向他国人民输出我们的做事方式,同时灌输我们的语言、教育、宗教和其它事物。
  而中国人恰恰相反,他们更喜欢待在家中,以中央王国(中国旧名,意味着世界核心)自居,认为自己拥有最高等的文明,因此他们没有理由涉足蛮夷之邦。
  1405年至1433年左右,郑和展开了7次伟大的航海之旅,虽然他的足迹遍及中国东海及南海,横跨印度洋,并远涉东非,但是他并未留下任何永久的痕迹&&他出海不是为了征服,而是为了展示中央帝国的荣耀。那些从中国离去并迁往东南亚的人被视为脱离文明,不值得皇帝再给予支持或保护。
  相反,英国和法国热烈赞美殖民扩张的楷模。我们的城市中充斥着他们的雕像和以他们而命名的街道。
  对中国不选择扩张也有另外一种解释。中国因幅员辽阔以及文化多元本身就不易统治,因此自古以来,其统治者忙于维护秩序和稳定以巩固自己的权力,同时无暇他顾。至今这点依旧适用于中国。
  中国领导人对国内的关心远甚于国外。由于中国面积巨大,其“扩张”方向并非世界,而局限在自己的领土内。
  最鲜明的例子是,从17世纪中期开始,清王朝以鲜血和惨战为代价开始向西征伐,中国因此得以幅员翻番。
  因此你会疑问,这些历史会向我们阐释&&中国成为超级大国后会如何表现吗?答案是:会从多方面给予我们启发。
  欧洲在历史上极具侵犯性和领土扩张意识。欧洲本身的历史就以无数场没有截止的战争为特征,在殖民扩张和世界大战时期,这些战争被投射到了世界这个大舞台上。军事力量&&欧洲向世界投射影响力的基石,以及必要时向它国强行灌输我们生活方式的欲望,一直是欧洲故事的核心。
  这也不难看出,美国(本身系欧洲海外殖民的衍生物)是如何从欧洲继承到这些特征的。
  中国不会这样,它的DNA里没有殖民侵略。中国的领导人对占领其余世界不感兴趣,相反更加操心巩固统治。这个拥有世界五分之一人口的国家将在未来更关注自身远甚于世界事务。
  时机到来时,确定无疑中国会拥有巨大的国际权力,不过中国施展权力的方式将非常不同。
  西方的权力标志是军事。截至今日美国的军费开支依旧占世界总额的一半。美国的前任欧洲,之所以能够进行殖民扩张,就是因为其军事力量远比当时世界其它国家的更为先进和强大。这种过分的军事力量从来都不是中国的特征。中国力量的精髓基于文化和经济。随着时间的演进,由于中国人口众多,其经济力量将十分庞大,甚至远甚顶峰时期的美国。虽然中国目前的发展水平不高,但是中国已经是世界多个国家的主要经济伙伴。伴随着经济力量的增长,中国将获得同等的政治力量和影响力。如果它愿意,中国将有能力使它国俯首称臣。
  文化力量对中国也尤为重要。中华文化硕果累累,曾不止一次成为世界文化的核心。例如,在唐代(7世纪至10世纪)和宋代(10世纪至13世纪),中国人在生物、水利、建筑、医药、数学和制图等多个领域均极大领先于世界。
  中国人对自身的历史成就是极其自豪的,他们相信中华文化是地球上最伟大最灿烂的文化。
  中国人的优越感植根于历史。他们将世界划分为多个层次,其中中国居首。中国的崛起只不过是这个观点的再次诠释。
  不要指望中国人对他们的崛起失去耐心。1972年,美国前国务卿亨利&基辛格请时任中国总理的周恩来,对法国大革命向世界造成的重要影响发表看法。周恩来回答说:“这个问题言之过早。”此问答相当著名。
  中国人的时间观念与西方人的截然不同。美国人总是认为时不待我,反之中国人总是认为来日方长。
  对中国人来说,一个世纪的时间不算什么。(作者:马丁&雅克 赵朔苇译)
  (原标题:英媒:中国将会成为怎样的超级大国?)
&&|&&&&|&&  中国是世界土地面积第几大国?
  中国国土面积约960万平方公里,仅次于俄罗斯和加拿大,居世界第三。我们还是以2000年为例吧!在2000年,我国七大重点流域地表水有机污染普遍,滇池、白洋淀、巢湖等水质污染严重。
  我国水资源严重短缺,地下水位总体下降,北方地区严重干旱,城市严重缺水。
  我国陆地总面积居世界第三位,但人均土地面积为0.777公顷,仅相当于世界人均土地的1/3;2000年中国耕地面积12823.31万公顷,人均耕地面积0.101公顷,不足世界人均耕地的一半。
  2000年占用耕地156.6万公顷,其中包括建设占用耕地、灾毁耕地等。耕地的大量减少,使我国的人地矛盾更加突出。两千年我国森林面积15894.1万公顷,森林覆盖率仅为16.55%,居世界130位左右。我国的天然草地面积逐步减少,质量不断下降,&三化&(退化、沙化、碱化)不断扩展。
  全国&三化&草地面积已达1.35亿公顷,草地环境生态形势十分严峻。
  据联合国粮农组织1985年资料,中国土地面积占全球有人居住土地总面积的7.2%,仅次于苏联、加拿大,居世界第三位;
  耕地和园地面积占世界6.8%,次于苏联、美国、印度,居第四位;
  永久性草地占世界9%,次于澳大利亚、苏联,居第三位;
  森林和林地占世界3.4%,次于苏联、巴西、加拿大、美国,居第五位;
  可开发的水资源占世界16.7%,居第一位;中国大陆架渔场约占世界优良渔场总面积的1/4;淡水鱼类种数居世界首位;
  中国是世界上矿产种类较为齐全的少数几个国家之一,已发现各类矿产168种,其中钨、锑、锌、钛、钒、稀土等10多种,储量居世界首位;锡、汞、煤、钼、石棉、滑石等居世界二、三位;按45种主要矿产储量计算的潜在价值占世界14.6%,仅次于苏联、美国,居第三位。
  但由于人口基数大,人均资源量远落后于世界人均量,如人均土地面积仅为世界人均的1/3;耕地面积仅为世界的1/3,森林面积为世界的1/6;草地为1/3;水资源为1/4;矿产资源为1/2。人均资源量排在世界各国的第120位。随着人口的逐年增加,人均资源量将不断减少,人均资源小国的地位难以改变。
上一篇:下一篇:
·&&&·&&&·&&&·&&&·&&&·&&&·&&&·&&&·&&&·&&&
三军网是中国最权威的中国军事网站,每日为大家提供了中国军事新闻,国际军事新闻还有网友对中国军事的最新爆料。中国战略网致力于全球政治、经济、军事研究,以增强公众对国际局势的了解。本站信息均转载于网络,如有侵权请及时与我们联系,我们将在24小时内处理。&&&
站长&& Email:&&印度雷迪夫网:为什么说中国将超过美国成为超级大国
从这里了解印度人对中国的看法
> 印度雷迪夫网:为什么说中国将超过美国成为超级大国
印度雷迪夫网:为什么说中国将超过美国成为超级大国
印度人评论:为什么说中国将超过美国成为超级大国,中国什么时候超过美国,中国能成为超级大国吗?三泰虎7月26日译文,印度雷迪夫网报道,中国过去几年里取得了快速进步,皮尤研究中心的全球态度调查显示,中国将最终取代美国成为世界头号经济大国。从2008年和2013年的调查可以看出,受访者中称美国是世界领先大国的中位百分比从47%下降至41%,而把中国置于榜首的受访者比例从20%上升至34%。
译文来源:三泰虎
外文标题:China will overthrow US as world superpower. HERE’S WHY!
外文地址:/news/report/slide-show-1-china-will-overthrow-us-as-world-superpower-heres-why/.htm
The Great Recession of 2008 hit United States hard and its impact seems to have a domino effect of sorts. Since 2008, perceptions about the economic balance of power in the world have been shifting.
China has gained rapidly over the past few years and will ultimately replace America as the world’s top global economic force, indicated polls conducted by Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project.
Looking at the 20 nations surveyed in both 2008 and 2013, the median percentage naming the US as the world’s leading power has declined from 47 per cent to 41 per cent while the median percentage placing China in the top spot has increased from 20 per cent to 34 per cent.
2008年大衰退严重袭击了美国,其影响似乎带有一种多米诺效应。自从2008年以来,人们对世界经济力量平衡的看法似乎在改变。
中国过去几年里快速进步,皮尤研究中心的全球态度调查显示,中国将最终取代美国成为世界头号经济大国。
从2008年和2013年受访20国的舆论可以看出,受访者中称美国是世界领先大国的中位百分比从47%下降至41%,而把中国置于榜首的受访者比例从20%上升至34%。
This trend has been especially apparent among some of America’s closest allies in Western Europe.
53 per cent in Britain say China is the leading economy.
33 per cent Brits name US the superpower.
Six-in-ten Germans (59 per cent) say China occupies the top position, while only 19 per cent think the US is the global economic leader, according to the survey.
In 23 of 39 nations, majorities say China either already has replaced or eventually will replace the US as the top superpower.
However, the US is still seen as the world’s leading economy in Latin America, Africa and Asia. According to the poll, 67 per cent in Japan and Philippines and 61 per cent in South Korea back the US.
47 per cent Chinese say their nation has already or will replace the US, and 47 per cent are of the opinion that this never happen.
The American opinion has shifted significantly since 2008, when only 36 per cent said China would become the top global power and 54 per cent believed it would never replace the US
Only six countries believe China will never replace the US.
Though the survey was conducted in India, the results were not included.
这一趋势在美国的西欧亲密盟友中特别明显。
53%的英国受访者称中国是领先经济体;
33%的英国受访者称美国是超级大国;
59%的德国受访者称中国居于领先位置,而认为美国是全球经济领袖的比例仅有19%;
在39个国家中,有23个国家的大多数受访者称中国已经或最终将取代美国成为头号超级大国;
然而,在拉丁美洲、非洲和亚洲,美国仍被视为领先经济体。调查显示,日本和菲律宾支持美国的比例是67%,韩国的这一比例是61%;
47%的中国受访者称他们国家已经或者将取代美国,47%受访者的看法是这种取代永远不可能发生;
美国公众的舆论自从2008年以来发生了显著改变,当时仅有36%的受访者说中国将会成为全球头号大国,54%的受访者相信中国永远不会取代美国;
仅有6个国家的舆论认为中国永远不会取代美国;
The military power of both nations worries many. China’s growing military strength is viewed with trepidation in neighbouring India, Japan, South Korea, Australia and the Philippines.
More than 9 in 10 in Japan (96 per cent) and South Korea (91 per cent) say that China’s growing military power is a bad thing, the poll points out.
Seven-in-ten Australians (71 per cent) are concerned about the growing strength of the People’s Liberation Army.
Only 2 per cent Pakistanis concerned about China’s military prowess
中美两国的军力令许多国家感到担忧。中国日益增强的军事力量让邻近的印度、日本、韩国、澳大利亚和菲律宾惶恐不已。
96%的日本受访者和91%的韩国受访者说中国日益增强的军力不是一件好事;
71%的澳大利亚受访者对解放军日益增加的军力表示担忧;
仅有2%的巴基斯坦受访者担忧中国的军事力量。
There is also less concern about China in Malaysia (20 per cent) and Indonesia (39 per cent). It is notable, however, that the proportion of Pakistanis, Malaysians and Indonesians who think China’s growing military power is a positive thing for their country is actually down from previous surveys.
Half or more of those surveyed in 16 of 38 nations surveyed see China as more of a partner.
82 per cent in Pakistan think China is a partner.
78 per cent Malaysians think China is friendly.
A number of African nations — including Senegal (78 per cent), Kenya (77 per cent), Nigeria (71 per cent) and Ghana (70 per cent) – are strongly of the view that China is a national partner.
58 per cent Americans think China is neither a partner nor an enemy.
Only four nations — Japan (40 per cent), the Philippines (39 per cent), Italy (39 per cent) and Turkey (36 per cent) – look at China as the enemy.
对中国军力加强表示担忧的比例较低的还有马来西亚(20%)和印尼(39%)。然而,相比前一次调查,巴基斯坦、马来西亚和印尼等国受访者认为中国日益增强的军力是利好的比例其实在下降。
在参与调查的38个国家中,有16个国家的一半或一半以上的受访者把中国更多地视为伙伴。
82%的巴基斯坦受访者认为中国是合作伙伴;
78%的马来西亚受访者认为中国是友好的;
许多非洲国家——塞内加尔(78%)、肯尼亚(77%)、尼日利亚(71%)和加纳(70%)——强烈认为中国是国家合作伙伴;
58%的美国受访者认为中国既不是合作伙伴也不是敌人;
仅有4个国家——日本(40%)、菲律宾(39%)、意大利(39%)和土耳其(36%)——把中国视为敌人。
Despite their proximity to China, in Southeast and South Asia, the public does not believe China has a greater impact on their countries than the US.
Malaysians feel there is 72 per cent of Chinese impact on their economy.
China’s influence is 41 per cent and America’s 44 per cent, feel Pakistanis.
87 per cent Pakistanis feel China’s influence is good. Only 5 per cent say America has a positive impact.
Nearly equal percentages of Indonesians say the two world powers have an influence on their economy (75 per cent for China and 72 per cent for the US). Filipinos, meanwhile, are more likely to believe the US (89 per cent) has a great deal or fair amount of influence on their economy than to say the same about China (69 per cent).
China is in favour in Malaysia. Indonesians rate each world power’s influence relatively equally.
尽管邻近中国,东南亚和南亚的公众并不认为中国对他们国家的影响大过美国的影响。
马来西亚受访者认为中国对他们经济的影响占72%;
巴基斯坦受访者认为中国的影响占41%,美国占44%;
87%的巴基斯坦受访者认为中国的影响是利好,仅有5%的受访者说美国带来了积极影响;
印尼受访者认为中国(75%)对他们经济体有影响的比例和认为美国(72%)对他们经济体有影响的比例大体相当。与此同时,菲律宾受访者更多地认为美国(89%)对他们经济体有影响,而认为中国对他们经济体有影响的比例是69%
中国在马来西亚更受支持。印尼受访者对两个世界大国的影响给出了大体相当的评价。
Among most nations surveyed, people under age 30 are especially likely to have a positive view of America.
In Turkey, 38 per cent of 18- to 29-year-olds give the US a favorable rating, compared with just eight per cent of Turks age 50 and older.
50 per cent in China who are under 30 havea favourable view compared with just 27 per cent among people 50 and older.
Similarly, in Malaysia there is a 21-percentage point gap between 18-to 29-year-olds and those 50 and older.
在大多数受访国家中,30岁以下的受访者尤其可能对美国持正面看法。
土耳其18岁到29岁的受访者中有38%的人对美国给出了正面评价,而在50岁以上受访者中的这一比例仅有8%;
中国30岁以下受访者中对美国持正面看法的比例是50%,而在50岁以上受访者中的这一比例是27%;
类似地,马来西亚18岁至29岁人群和50岁以上人群中对美国持正面看法的比例相差21个百分点。
When asked whether they think of the US as a partner to their country, an enemy, or neither, clear majorities in 22 nations say it is a partner. It is seen as an enemy in only four nations included in the survey.
Five of the eight European Union countries polled describe the US as a partner.
72 per cent Germans consider US a partner.
67 per cent in France think of it as an ally.
Only 30 per cent of Greeks express this opinion, 22 per cent say the US is an enemy.
Russians are closely divided: 31 per cent consider the US a partner, but 26 per cent see it as an enemy.
Among Middle Eastern nations, only Israelis (90 per cent) think of the US as a partner.
76 per cent of Palestinians consider the US an enemy.
In Pakistan, 64 per cent describe America as an enemy.
当被问及美国是合作伙伴、敌人或者都不是时,22个国家的绝大多数受访者说是伙伴,仅在4个受访国家被认为是敌人。
在参与调查的8个欧盟国家中,有5个国家把美国形容为合作伙伴。
72%的德国受访者认为美国是合作伙伴;
67%的法国受访者认为美国是伙伴;
仅有30%的希腊人表达了(美国是伙伴)的观点,22%的人说美国是敌人;
俄罗斯受访者明显分为两派:31%的人视美国为伙伴,26%的人视其为敌人;
在中东国家中,仅有以色列人(90%)认为美国是伙伴;
76%的巴勒斯坦人认为美国是敌人;
64%的巴基斯坦人把美国形容为敌人;
Since US President Barack Obama took office in 2009, his popularity has given America’s image a significant boost, especially in Europe. Obama has largely received more positive ratings than his predecessor, George W Bush. But, Obama’s ratings today are lower than when he took office. China has seen a steep decline in the US president’s popularity.
88 per cent Germans back Obama and his policies.
83 per cent in F 81 per cent in Canada are Obama supporters.
31 per cent Chinese support Obama today, as against 62 per cent in 2009.
自从美国总统奥巴马在2009年执政以来,他的人气给美国形象带来了显著提升,特别是在欧洲。奥巴马收获的正面评价要比前任总统布什多得多,但是目前的评价比执政时候要低。此外,奥巴马总统在中国的人气出现了急剧下滑。
88%的德国人支持奥巴马及其政策;
83%的法国人和81%的加拿大人是奥巴马的支持者;
31%的中国人支持奥巴马,相较之下2009年时的这一比例是62%。
Egypt and Pakistan, two nations that are major recipients of US assistance, but surprisingly they do not view it positively.
55 per cent in Egypt say economic aid is not useful.
43 per cent Pakistanis think impact of US aid is negative.
However, in the sub-Saharan African countries surveyed — Kenya, Ghana, Uganda – the US receives positive marks of assistance.
埃及和巴基斯坦是美国援助的两个主要接收方,但令人惊讶的是他们对美国的看法并不正面。
55%的埃及人说经济援助没有用;
43%的巴基斯坦人认为美国援助的影响是负面的;
然而,在撒哈拉以南受访非洲国家中——肯尼亚、加纳、乌干达——美国的援助得到了正面评价。
Compared with the US, the government of China receives much lower ratings for how it treats its citizens.
87 per cent in Germany, 86 per cent in France believe individual freedoms are not respected in China.
84 per cent in Spain and 82 per cent in Italy feel the same.
47 per cent Russians feel the Chinese government respects people’s rights.
Majorities in 37 of the 39 nations surveyed say the US government respects personal freedoms. The highest ratings for the US on this question come from the Philippines (91 per cent) and South Korea (9 per cent). And at least eight-in-ten hold this view in Lebanon (8 per cent), Japan (85 per cent), Israel (83 per cent), Italy (82 per cent), Germany (81 per cent) and France (80 per cent).
相比美国,中国在对待本国国民方面收获的评价要低得多。
87%的德国人和86%的法国人认为个人自由在中国不受尊重;
西班牙和意大利持同样看法的这一比例分别是84%和82%;
47%的俄罗斯人认为中国尊重人民的权利;
在39个受访国家中有37个国家认为美国政府尊重个人自由,最高的比例来自菲律宾(91%)和韩国(90%)。此外,黎巴嫩(80%)、日本(85%)、以色列(83%)、意大利(82%)、德国(81%)和法国(80%)持这一看法的比例至少有80%。
The Obama administration’s use of drone strikes faces broad opposition — half or more in 31 of 39 countries disapprove of drone attacks against extremist groups. At least three-in-four hold this view in 15 countries from all corners of the world, including nations from the Middle East, Europe, Latin America and Asia, the survey says.
However, three countries support the drone campaign:
61 per cent Americans back their government’s drone policy.
64 per cent Israelis approve of the US 56 per cent in Kenya.
German support for drone attacks has actually risen slightly since last year — today, 45 per cent approve, compared with 38 per cent in 2012.
45 per cent in France back drone strikes.
奥巴马当局动用无人机遭到了广泛反对——39个受访国家中有31个国家不赞成对极端组织发起无人机袭击,其中15个国家中至少有75%的人持这一看法,其中包括来自中东、欧洲、拉丁美洲和亚洲的国家。
然而,有三个国家支持无人机袭击:
61%的美国人支持本国政府的无人机政策;
64%的以色列人赞成美国发动无人机袭击,肯尼亚的这一比例是56%;
德国支持无人机袭击的比例比去年有所上升——目前是45%的人赞成,2012年的这一比例是38%;
45%的法国人支持无人机袭击。
以下是印度网民的评论:
译文来源:三泰虎 /thread-.html
huge market for toothpaste and mouthwash
if one can convince the chinese that they have the worst instances of bad breath on earth. Sheesh.
要是有人能说服中国人,让他们相信自己是世界上最口臭的人,(那么中国将是牙膏和洗口药的庞大市场)。
The Chinese economy
is today about four times the size of the Indian one.
And the Chinese are still growing at about 8 % per annum while the Indians are now at about 6 %.
The 4 to 1 gap could soon become 5 to 1, then 7 to 1 and so on.
And all the while, stuxpid middle class Indians keep braying about the Indian economy soon overtaking the Chinese one!
当今中国经济规模是印度经济的4倍。
中国仍然以每年8%的速度发展,而印度的发展速度大约是6%。
4比1的差距很快会扩大到5比1,然后7比1 …….
与此同时,愚蠢的印度中产阶级一直叫喊着印度经济将很快超过中国经济!
China will become a superpower but won’t overtake USA
by indianguru
Even if China surpass USA in economy/GDP/Military, it’s missing influential soft-power. USA, the past 60 years has become a hyper-superpower due to its strong influential soft-power. American culture has become a fabric of every society in the world and will probably last 1000 years. China will surpass USA, but will become a 2nd superpower on par with USA.
即使中国在经济/GDP/军事上超过美国,但中国缺乏软实力。在过去60年里,美国凭借强大的软实力成为了超级大国。美国文化成为了世界上每一个社会的一部分,并且这种情况可能将持续1000年。中国将会超过美国,但仅是与美国平起平坐的第二个超级大国。
by Sharmila Bose
After destroying EU, US and now it is China’s turn to get destroyed.. All their economic prosperity is vested in Arm and Weapon and militarily support to British IR..
Super Power Game is just an eyewash..
继欧美被摧毁后,现在轮到中国被摧毁了……
超级大国游戏就是无稽之谈…….
a long march
by li chao
In 80s Deng Xiaoping said that China will be a mid-developed country by 2050. And Uganda plan to be a mid-income country by 2016. So you can know the position where China is, and how hard to get it
1980年代时,邓小平说中国将在2050年成为中等发达国家;乌干达计划到2016年成为中等收入国家。你们现在知道中国所处的位置了,很难得的。
Phew ! Research Centre survey
by Janarddan
Highest chance is that the survey’s outcome is rubbish.
Without conducting survey one can say that China will replace US in less than a decade. More drastic developments will see it happen even faster.
这份调查结果极有可能是扯淡。
你不用调查便知中国将在不到十年内取代美国。要是中国发展得再猛烈些,那么这种取代将来得更快。
Some people and agencies do not have worthwhile job
by RamuKaka
so they do such surveys to draw attention.
Just like in India, some agencies did surveys and declared that so and so percent voters like the killer leader of Gujarat is more popular…and the ruling party will lose some vote share…blah blah blah
某些人和某些机构就是无聊,为了吸引注意力而搞这些调查。
印度也一样,某些机构发起调查,然后宣布有多少比例的选民支持古吉拉特邦的领导人,谁更受欢迎,执政党将会失去一些选票…….blah blah blah……
Super power China Vs America
by venkata sivananda
Super power is not related to increase in manpower might. In this advanced world, manpower alone will not make any country superpower.
Secondly if you look at China, it is very small country compared to USA.
Thirdly how China will never replace USA for its own interests. China is over dependent on many countries for want of natural resources
超级大国与人多没有关系。在当今先进世界,人多并不能让一个国家成为超级大国。
其次,稍微比较一下,中国与美国比起来是一个非常小的国家。
第三,中国如何取代美国,前者过度依赖许多国家的自然资源。
Re: Super power China Vs America
by indianguru
should google the information before posting false information. Isn’t USA chasing after resources around the world, they lost a continent “Africa” to China.
发帖前先谷歌一下。美国不也是满世界找资源,他们已经把非洲输给中国了。
Re: Super power China Vs America
by Janarddan
China is small compared to USA ? Nonsense.
China is the third biggest in terms of land area and US is fourth.
China is first in terms of population.
China’s economy will be the biggest in just about 7 to 8 years.
中国相比美国是小国?胡说!
中国是世界上领土面积第三大的国家,美国排第四
中国人口排第一
大约七八年后,中国经济将会成为世界最大。
Re: Super power China Vs America
by vilas apte
Who is this Sivananda,his IQ seems to be in single digits. He is saying China is a small country, for his information China’s land mass is bigger than his favourite USA’s.
这个叫sivananda的人是谁,智商似乎只有个位数。他居然说中国是一个小国。告诉你吧,中国领土面积比美国更大。
by kskumar
China replacing the US? It doesn’t happen just because many people surveyed think so. The hard realities are that China started as the global hub for outsourced manufacturing and to a large extent continues even today to be that. It doesn’t create technology, it only copies them. Their role in world affairs is minimal. Can the Chinese think of intervening in other countries like the US or even the Europe does? Their intimidatory rhetoric and actions are confined to Asia alone, where China is viewed as a bully. No doubt China has done remarkably well in human development index. It has grown economically, but at the cost of poisoned environment and related health issues.
It it still early to even think of China replacing the US in anything except may be the economy. China has grown but has retained the petty mindedness of a small nation.
中国取代美国?并非许多受访者这样认为,中国就真的会取代美国!现实是中国以全球制造业中心起步,迄今很大程度上仍然如此,并未创造出技术,仅仅是模仿而已,他们在世界事务上的角色微乎其微。
中国人是否敢干涉美国甚或欧洲的事务?他们恫吓的言论和行动也仅限于亚洲,结果被亚洲国家视为土霸。
毫无疑问,中国在人类发展指数上表现非常好,经济取得了显著进步,但这是以环境受污染以及由此引发的健康问题为代价的。
中国要取代美国还早着呢,不过经济方面可能是个例外。中国不断壮大,但保留了小国的小家子思维。
by Jai Babu
Excellent comments kskumar!
And do not forget that China is the main supporter of regimes like North Korea & Myanmar. Even look at how China supports Pakistan!
kskumar,你的评论很赞!
但别忘了,中国是朝鲜和缅甸等政权的主要支持者。况且,看看他们是如何支持巴基斯坦的!
by vilas apte
You are right KS, China can never be a USA, because it does not have that type of money to invade other countries and maintain its army there( to be designated as a superpower). At the most China can overtake USA in the remaining industrial parameters(as it has already gone ahead of USA in steel, cement,aluminium,car(production & sales),infrastructure spending,exports,etc), but due to its huge population will never be able to surpass USA’s per capita income(PCI),though it may overtake USA in GDP output. At the most China could reach to become a medium high economic level country with a PCI about $ 20,000-$ 25,000/year.
你说得对,中国永远成为不了美国,他们没有那种资本来入侵其他国家并在当地驻军.
中国充其量会在工业指数上超过美国(它已经在钢铁、水泥、铝和汽车的产销量、基建开支、出口等方面超过美国),由于人口众多,中国永远不可能在人均收入上超过美国,不过GDP产出也许会超过美国。
总之,中国最多成为人均收入2万至2.5万美元的中高经济水平国家。
by Venkat Srinivasan
Wonder how people even dream of such things!! Then time for Marxists in India to celebrate!! Build temples for Mao!!! High hopes!!!
居然有人会梦想这样的事情!印度的马克思主义者该庆祝了!给毛修庙吧!
by Nirpinder Singh
Yippee! Then India will be the Mexico of the Asian Continent
好啊!印度届时会成为亚洲的墨西哥
Who is the author of this article?
by Doctor Snow
Useless author… Why is this word used frequently?
The word “Superpower” belongs to cold war era. and it belongs to only to the two arch rival countries that survived the COLD WAR.
Superpower is the power to deliver death and destruction to the enemy in an unimaginable way at its fullest, the world could ever imagine and witness.
It has nothing to do with economy.
These two countries are still SUPERPOWERS. They both still have the potential Defense wise.
作者很垃圾,为什么频频使用“超级大国”这个词?
“超级大国”这个词属于冷战时期的产物,专门指在冷战中挺过来的两个主要竞争对手。
超级大国是指能以世人无法想象的方式摧毁敌人并致敌人于死地的国家,与经济没有一点关系!
(美俄)两国仍是超级大国,仍然拥有潜在的国防实力。
Let’s see
by usha sundaram
If, just in case if, U.S. decides to stop all imports from China, China’s economy will go in tailspin. Whether U.S. will do this drastic step is nother question. China’s economy is U.S. centric and cannot survive with out U.S. supporting its manufacturing base. It is as simple as that.
假如美国决定停止从中国的一切进口,那么中国经济会陷入混乱。美国是否会走这一步姑且另当别论。中国经济是以美国为中心的,要是缺少美国对其制造业的支持,中国无法生存下来,就这么简单。
Re: Let’s see
Are you aware that whole of the great Indian IT sector is fully dependent on US & Europe?
你知道吗,整个印度IT业完全依靠欧美
Re: Let’s see
by Praveen Lakhotia
Usha madam, today China holds $ 1.32 trillion US T-Bonds,(it holds over 20% of bonds, the maximum by far of all countries) try to visualize what will be the fate of the US $ if China sells releases even half of its stock of T-Bonds in the market. The $ will crash, therefore US will never stop buying Chinese goods,it will use strong language against China,pull it up on human rights, but will never take harsh action,because of this above danger.
Usha女士,中国今天手握1.32万亿美元美债。想象一下,要是中国在市场上抛售哪怕是其中一半的美债,美元的命运将会怎么样?美元会奔溃的!因此美国决不会停止购买中国货,充其量对中国发出一些强硬声音,扯一扯认全问题等,但考虑到以上提及的危险,美国决不会采取严厉行动。
We are interested in
by Jugal Ahuja
We are interested in seeing & knowing how the Indian participants voted in the above survey. I am sure Indians must have voted very favourably for the US,as every years thousands of Indians leave our shores for higher studies and seek a future in a country,which in their minds is heaven on earth.Japanese and Indians fear/hate China the most amongst Asians.
我们有兴趣知道印度受访者在这份调查中是如何投票的?印度人肯定偏好美国,因为每年有数以千计的印度人前往他们心目中的天堂国家进行深造和追求美好未来。在亚洲人当中,最害怕或讨厌中国的是日本人和印度人。
China & India
by Thankachan
In China the communist government is for the people while in India the congress government is by the people for loot the people.
中国的gcd政府为人民服务,印度的国大党政府大肆掠夺人民。
Re: .China & India
by Venugopalan
in communist China if you protest against government you will probably face a firing squad..in India you could become a leader .that’s the difference
在中国,你要是胆敢抗议政府,那么你很可能被毙掉;在印度,你也许能成为领导人。这就是区别之处。
Re: .China & India
in India a person who masterminded massacres and holocausts could run for PM.. not in China
在印度,你要是掌握了屠殺的本领,那么可以角逐总理职位,在中国不行。
Super power?
by Rationalist
To be superpower one also needs to be innovative and be ahead in race. But China is not in that league. They are best only in duplicating and imitating. However fast they do this ,their nose will still be behind the first who is innovating.
要想成为超级大国,你还需要具有创新能力,要能够在前面领跑,中国在这方面不行!他们最擅长的是模仿,不管发展得多快,他们也只能跟在创新者后面!
USA is just waiting to repeat the USSR on CHINA
by vinod shenbaga
USA is ,was and will remain the supreme power.
美国等着苏联的命运在中国身上重演
美国以前、现在和未来都将永远是超级大国。
Re: China as a Super Power
by Maximum
Read news like
Chinese Bank Tops World Banks Ranking For First.
Read News like
China Holds usd one trillion in bonds
Global Trade and china
Largest army on Earth
Rather than sharing thoughts of your autism
中国银行跻身世界银行排行榜榜首
中国持有1万亿美元美债
中国保持有世界上最庞大的军队
Re: Re: China as a Super Power
by Doctor Snow
buying bond paper of your competitor. You think that’s a good idea?
What largest army? The count?
The US destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 2 days. Numbers doesnt matter.
你认为买竞争对手的废纸是好主意?
最庞大的军队?多少?
美国两天就摧毁了广岛和长崎,数量并不重要。
China is fake
by Doctor Snow
US IS REAL. US has so many practical victories.
They have practically invented, discovered,used and abused
every technology and discovery known to mankind.
Americans are Hardworkers too. Otherwise they cannot be in Number One.
Their Legal System is the best in the world. Their Influence and Power and Hardwork and Intelligence and Potential is far far from any other country.
Like it or not. China is no match for United States.
中国是假的,美国是实实在在的。
美国有太多实在的胜利可吹嘘
他们发明、发现、利用了每一项人类所知的技术。
美国人也很勤劳,否则成不了第一
美国的法律系统是世界最棒的,他们的影响力、智力和潜力远超世界任何其他国家。
不管喜不喜欢,中国与美国根本就没得比。
USA is 100 years ahead of China
by Pehelwan
What a joke. Since when did nations become powerful due to public opinion.Western countries/USA are far ahead. Their economy is solid . China’sEconomy is based on consumption in USA.USA is 100 years ahead of China in Technology.China is acopy cat. It follows USA.It can never overtake USA
真是笑话。自从什么时候公众舆论能让一个国家变强大了,西方国家/美国遥遥领先,他们的经济牢不可破,反观中国经济依靠美国的消费。美国技术领先中国100年,中国是盲目模仿者,老是学美国,永远也超不过美国。
INDIA WILL OVER TAKE CHINA
by peri kamesh
IN NEXT FEW YEARS INDIA WILL OVER TAKE CHINA
未来几年,印度将会超过中国。
Re: INDIA WILL OVER TAKE CHINA
You hv to get rid of the Congress first.
得先把国大党赶下台。
Re: Re: INDIA WILL OVER TAKE CHINA
by giveanid
Congress made India the second fastest growing economy in the world.
国大党让印度成为了世界上发展速度第二快的经济体。
by Ravinder Rawat
Once China overtakes US, the congress can happily give away ladakh, Arunchal and other north east parts of the country. now lets wait for pakistan to become stronger than us!
一旦,国大党将会高兴地放弃拉达克、阿邦和其他东北邦领土。让我们等着巴基斯坦变得比我们强大吧。
版权所有: 非特殊声明均为本站原创文章,转载请注明出处:
订阅更新: 您可以通过}

我要回帖

更多关于 世界唯一的超级大国 的文章

更多推荐

版权声明:文章内容来源于网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵权请点击这里与我们联系,我们将及时删除。

点击添加站长微信